More baseball fun, this time from Mark Roberts,
In the last couple of days, I watched more baseball than I have in a
couple of years. In the end, it was not much fun for someone from Texas,
though I’ve got to give tons of credit to the St. Louis Cardinals. They
proved to have great fortitude in addition to great talent.
But I have one gripe and one question.
My
gripe is this: spitting. Not only did I see more baseball in the last
week than I have in a long time, but also I saw more spitting than I
have in the last decade. At one point, I started to count the number of
spits in an inning, but I lost track into the twenties. I realize that
lots of players are chewing tobacco. I hear that some have gone
healthier, with sunflower seeds or gum. But, I don’t care if they’re
chewing their tongues, the spitting thing is obnoxious. I suppose if I
were to watch baseball all the time I’d get used to it. But, frankly,
this gives me a good reason not to watch. I just don’t particularly want
to watch people spitting all the time.
My question:
What’s up with the beards? It seemed like almost every player on the
Cardinals and the Rangers had a beard. Now this doesn’t bother me. I
wore a beard for more than half of my adult life. I’m just curious about
where the beard wearing came from. In the olden days, professional
athletes had short, well-managed hair, and they were almost always
clean-shaven. Now, it’s not uncommon to see long hair flowing out from
the back of NFL helmets. And I guess if you really want to play in the
World Series, you’d better have a beard. And not just a scruffy “I’m not
shaving during the playoffs” beard, but a well-manicured beauty. Does
anybody know when baseball players started wearing beards? Is there some
magic reason?
I can see only one major problem with the beard
thing, and that’s the mixture of beard and spitting. I’d be afraid to
guess what’s lurking in some of those beards. Ugh!
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment